Review



eclipse dualtec separation system  (Waters Corporation)


Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Waters Corporation manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Waters Corporation eclipse dualtec separation system
    Eclipse Dualtec Separation System, supplied by Waters Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 819 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/eclipse dualtec separation system/product/Waters Corporation
    Average 96 stars, based on 819 article reviews
    eclipse dualtec separation system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    96/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    96
    Waters Corporation eclipse dualtec separation system
    Eclipse Dualtec Separation System, supplied by Waters Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/eclipse dualtec separation system/product/Waters Corporation
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    eclipse dualtec separation system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Waters Corporation eclipse dualtec af4 separation system
    Eclipse Dualtec Af4 Separation System, supplied by Waters Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/eclipse dualtec af4 separation system/product/Waters Corporation
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    eclipse dualtec af4 separation system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Waters Corporation eclipse dualtec af 4 separation system
    Mean PSD and their uncertainties by cell line. EV PSD was measured in triplicate for each method (AF 4 , Cryo-EM, MRPS, PTA) and then combined into a mean distribution by averaging the three probabilities of each replicate for three cell lines: (( a ), left ) GFP, (( b ), left ) LNCaP, and (( c ), left ) MSC. Mean PSD for <t>AF</t> <t>4</t> (black), Cryo-EM (red), MRPS (green), and PTA (blue). Single measurement relative uncertainties for each independent replicate in % at each diameter (nm) for three cell lines: (( a ), center ) GFP, (( b ), center ) LNCaP, and (( c ), center ) MSC for AF 4 (black), Cryo-EM (red), MRPS (green), and PTA (blue). AF 4 single measurement relative uncertainty values are near zero. Replicate-to-replicate relative uncertainties in % at each diameter (nm) for the mean distributions of three cell lines: (( a ), right ) GFP, (( b ), right ) LNCaP, and (( c ), right ) MSC for AF 4 (black), Cryo-EM (red), MRPS (green), and PTA (blue). Cryo-EM was not performed on GFP VLPs. Cryo-EM was not performed in triplicate; a single analysis of ≈500 particles was evaluated.
    Eclipse Dualtec Af 4 Separation System, supplied by Waters Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/eclipse dualtec af 4 separation system/product/Waters Corporation
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    eclipse dualtec af 4 separation system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Waters Corporation eclipse dualtec separation module
    Mean PSD and their uncertainties by cell line. EV PSD was measured in triplicate for each method (AF 4 , Cryo-EM, MRPS, PTA) and then combined into a mean distribution by averaging the three probabilities of each replicate for three cell lines: (( a ), left ) GFP, (( b ), left ) LNCaP, and (( c ), left ) MSC. Mean PSD for <t>AF</t> <t>4</t> (black), Cryo-EM (red), MRPS (green), and PTA (blue). Single measurement relative uncertainties for each independent replicate in % at each diameter (nm) for three cell lines: (( a ), center ) GFP, (( b ), center ) LNCaP, and (( c ), center ) MSC for AF 4 (black), Cryo-EM (red), MRPS (green), and PTA (blue). AF 4 single measurement relative uncertainty values are near zero. Replicate-to-replicate relative uncertainties in % at each diameter (nm) for the mean distributions of three cell lines: (( a ), right ) GFP, (( b ), right ) LNCaP, and (( c ), right ) MSC for AF 4 (black), Cryo-EM (red), MRPS (green), and PTA (blue). Cryo-EM was not performed on GFP VLPs. Cryo-EM was not performed in triplicate; a single analysis of ≈500 particles was evaluated.
    Eclipse Dualtec Separation Module, supplied by Waters Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/eclipse dualtec separation module/product/Waters Corporation
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    eclipse dualtec separation module - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Waters Corporation asymmetric flow field flow fractionation af4 eclipse dualtec separation system
    Mean PSD and their uncertainties by cell line. EV PSD was measured in triplicate for each method (AF 4 , Cryo-EM, MRPS, PTA) and then combined into a mean distribution by averaging the three probabilities of each replicate for three cell lines: (( a ), left ) GFP, (( b ), left ) LNCaP, and (( c ), left ) MSC. Mean PSD for <t>AF</t> <t>4</t> (black), Cryo-EM (red), MRPS (green), and PTA (blue). Single measurement relative uncertainties for each independent replicate in % at each diameter (nm) for three cell lines: (( a ), center ) GFP, (( b ), center ) LNCaP, and (( c ), center ) MSC for AF 4 (black), Cryo-EM (red), MRPS (green), and PTA (blue). AF 4 single measurement relative uncertainty values are near zero. Replicate-to-replicate relative uncertainties in % at each diameter (nm) for the mean distributions of three cell lines: (( a ), right ) GFP, (( b ), right ) LNCaP, and (( c ), right ) MSC for AF 4 (black), Cryo-EM (red), MRPS (green), and PTA (blue). Cryo-EM was not performed on GFP VLPs. Cryo-EM was not performed in triplicate; a single analysis of ≈500 particles was evaluated.
    Asymmetric Flow Field Flow Fractionation Af4 Eclipse Dualtec Separation System, supplied by Waters Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/asymmetric flow field flow fractionation af4 eclipse dualtec separation system/product/Waters Corporation
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    asymmetric flow field flow fractionation af4 eclipse dualtec separation system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Mean PSD and their uncertainties by cell line. EV PSD was measured in triplicate for each method (AF 4 , Cryo-EM, MRPS, PTA) and then combined into a mean distribution by averaging the three probabilities of each replicate for three cell lines: (( a ), left ) GFP, (( b ), left ) LNCaP, and (( c ), left ) MSC. Mean PSD for AF 4 (black), Cryo-EM (red), MRPS (green), and PTA (blue). Single measurement relative uncertainties for each independent replicate in % at each diameter (nm) for three cell lines: (( a ), center ) GFP, (( b ), center ) LNCaP, and (( c ), center ) MSC for AF 4 (black), Cryo-EM (red), MRPS (green), and PTA (blue). AF 4 single measurement relative uncertainty values are near zero. Replicate-to-replicate relative uncertainties in % at each diameter (nm) for the mean distributions of three cell lines: (( a ), right ) GFP, (( b ), right ) LNCaP, and (( c ), right ) MSC for AF 4 (black), Cryo-EM (red), MRPS (green), and PTA (blue). Cryo-EM was not performed on GFP VLPs. Cryo-EM was not performed in triplicate; a single analysis of ≈500 particles was evaluated.

    Journal: Biomolecules

    Article Title: Intermethod Characterization of Commercially Available Extracellular Vesicles as Reference Materials

    doi: 10.3390/biom16010066

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Mean PSD and their uncertainties by cell line. EV PSD was measured in triplicate for each method (AF 4 , Cryo-EM, MRPS, PTA) and then combined into a mean distribution by averaging the three probabilities of each replicate for three cell lines: (( a ), left ) GFP, (( b ), left ) LNCaP, and (( c ), left ) MSC. Mean PSD for AF 4 (black), Cryo-EM (red), MRPS (green), and PTA (blue). Single measurement relative uncertainties for each independent replicate in % at each diameter (nm) for three cell lines: (( a ), center ) GFP, (( b ), center ) LNCaP, and (( c ), center ) MSC for AF 4 (black), Cryo-EM (red), MRPS (green), and PTA (blue). AF 4 single measurement relative uncertainty values are near zero. Replicate-to-replicate relative uncertainties in % at each diameter (nm) for the mean distributions of three cell lines: (( a ), right ) GFP, (( b ), right ) LNCaP, and (( c ), right ) MSC for AF 4 (black), Cryo-EM (red), MRPS (green), and PTA (blue). Cryo-EM was not performed on GFP VLPs. Cryo-EM was not performed in triplicate; a single analysis of ≈500 particles was evaluated.

    Article Snippet: An Eclipse DualTec AF 4 separation system (Wyatt Technology, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) was interfaced with an Agilent HPLC system (Model 1260, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) including a UV/Vis diode array detector (Model 1260, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), a HELEOS-II multiangle light scattering instrument (HELEOS-II, Wyatt Technology, Santa Barbara, CA, USA), and a differential refractive index detector (Optilab T-Rex, Wyatt Technology, Santa Barbara, CA, USA).

    Techniques: Cryo-EM Sample Prep

    Comparison of mean PSD by method. Particle PSD was measured in triplicate for each cell line (LNCaP EVs, MSC EVs, and GFP VLPs) and then combined into a mean distribution by averaging the three probabilities of each replicate using four methods: ( a ) Cryo-EM, ( b ) MRPS, ( c ) PTA, and ( d ) AF 4 . Cryo-Em was not performed on GFP VLP. Cryo-EM was not performed in triplicate; a single analysis of ≈500 particles was evaluated.

    Journal: Biomolecules

    Article Title: Intermethod Characterization of Commercially Available Extracellular Vesicles as Reference Materials

    doi: 10.3390/biom16010066

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of mean PSD by method. Particle PSD was measured in triplicate for each cell line (LNCaP EVs, MSC EVs, and GFP VLPs) and then combined into a mean distribution by averaging the three probabilities of each replicate using four methods: ( a ) Cryo-EM, ( b ) MRPS, ( c ) PTA, and ( d ) AF 4 . Cryo-Em was not performed on GFP VLP. Cryo-EM was not performed in triplicate; a single analysis of ≈500 particles was evaluated.

    Article Snippet: An Eclipse DualTec AF 4 separation system (Wyatt Technology, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) was interfaced with an Agilent HPLC system (Model 1260, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) including a UV/Vis diode array detector (Model 1260, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), a HELEOS-II multiangle light scattering instrument (HELEOS-II, Wyatt Technology, Santa Barbara, CA, USA), and a differential refractive index detector (Optilab T-Rex, Wyatt Technology, Santa Barbara, CA, USA).

    Techniques: Comparison, Cryo-EM Sample Prep